{ "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "org_description": "Kapaciti AB regulatory classification evaluation suite. Compliance agent under test classified across 18 scenarios spanning EU AI Act, GDPR Art 30, IMY beslut, SFS interpretation.", "bundle_type": "regulatory-evaluation", "generated_at": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "run_date": "2026-05-20", "agent_model_under_test": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "total_entries": 18, "hash_chain_valid": true, "signature_algorithm": "ed25519", "entries": [ { "seq": 1, "id": "ai-act-001-cv-rankning", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.807Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "CV-rankning för bemanningsföretag", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "0350037f6cb7862cc0f8c016bb40a602012285ede0589c9897bd263ce69af0dc", "output_hash": "4613799535b6332e8e8f62d9420ea2755342af8d5ec3ceaffeed5536832ee8a8", "agent_duration_ms": 30904, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar high-risk korrekt", "weight": 0.4, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response correctly classifies the system as high-risk, cites Annex III §4(a) via Art 6(2) as primary basis, and matches the ground-truth tier exactly. The criterion is identifying high-risk correctly." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Annex III §4(a) specifikt med rätt nummer och bokstav", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response cites \"Annex III §4(a)\" specifically with correct number and letter, both as primary article and in the rationale, matching the expected ground truth exactly." }, { "criterion": "Listar minst 3 av 5 huvudskyldigheter (Art 9, 10, 13, 14, 15)", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response lists all five required obligations (Art 9, 10, 13, 14, 15) with substantive descriptions, exceeding the threshold of at least 3. Extra articles (11, 12) do not violate the criterion." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer som inte finns i AI Act", "weight": 0.1, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (6(2), 9-15) and Annex III §4(a) exist in the AI Act. Arts 11/12 are extra but real and correctly applied. No fabricated numbers, dates, or case-ids present." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Annex III §4(a)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "this_hash": "6a89049e920d654fc89d410855a4d319acddd1b46619ed28734a14208ebcaa8b", "signature": "CFBt7dF51nWRBKLMIOlM3RVrytf4Zz5yPYZCzDCftO+SLcI9K5iL5vnTL/x37nRiKMzviM6Z1bC0FjEzfXzRCg==" }, { "seq": 2, "id": "ai-act-002-kundtjanst-chatbot", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.809Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "Kundtjänst-chatbot för e-handel", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "2725999991be3dad59c93cdaa500c563cc2cb8fe07ea01c5c11b341b71d999d8", "output_hash": "41b975df906daaf91ed9c9f72275fe3d976ac57466355545e8d3c82a78a655ea", "agent_duration_ms": 38453, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.9999999999999999, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar limited-risk korrekt och INTE high-risk", "weight": 0.35, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly classifies the chatbot as limited-risk and rules out high-risk via Annex III analysis, matching the ground-truth tier. Criterion satisfied on both required elements." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Art 50 transparenskrav specifikt", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly cites Art 50.1 as primary basis and Art 50 transparency obligation, matching the expected ground truth citation for AI interacting with natural persons." }, { "criterion": "Förklarar att chatbot inte ingår i Annex III", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states none of Annex III's eight areas cover an e-commerce shoe support chatbot, citing specific examples (§5(b), §4(b)) and noting no legal-effect decisions, satisfying the criterion." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (50.1, 50.2, 50.4, 6.2, Annex III, 95, 51) are genuine EU AI Act provisions. No fabricated article numbers, dates, or case-ids present. Citations align with general knowledge of the law." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 50.1 transparenskrav för AI som interagerar med fysiska personer", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "6a89049e920d654fc89d410855a4d319acddd1b46619ed28734a14208ebcaa8b", "this_hash": "58804c138a26cb5f6113083a10e5df1778e68330ccb8fdc73b353bce45802881", "signature": "ayR/2tEZPepMRPqWRzMbzCkZ4d8Z+eTg5MXzLIj2qUVr+cgAIzcMr24zpdlq9B/HdM3HYtLCUzPjZ2nVTNtjBQ==" }, { "seq": 3, "id": "ai-act-003-kreditscoring", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.809Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "Kreditscoring för konsumentlån", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "5b99b0fb26a915f1261bad664a9f2dcc32298cfa8a2025c62d458a4baaa5ee9b", "output_hash": "7041d2da9801256c0186243868c071e16ca84381292b83f5b0d1909f8f511056", "agent_duration_ms": 30657, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.9999999999999999, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar high-risk korrekt", "weight": 0.35, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly classifies the system as HIGH-RISK and correctly grounds it in Annex III §5(b) (kreditvärdighetsbedömning av fysiska personer), matching the expected tier." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Annex III §5(b) specifikt med rätt nummer och bokstav", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response cites \"Annex III §5(b)\" specifically with correct number and letter, matching the expected ground truth exactly, including the fraud-detection exemption framing." }, { "criterion": "Nämner mänsklig övervakning (Art 14) som specifikt krav", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly lists Art 14 as \"krav på mänsklig övervakning\" in supporting articles and details it as obligation #6, matching the criterion requirement." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (6.2, 9-15, 22 GDPR via deployer ref, 26) are real EU AI Act provisions consistent with ground truth. Art 11, 12, 26 are correct genuine high-risk provisions, not fabrications. No invented numbers." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Annex III §5(b)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "58804c138a26cb5f6113083a10e5df1778e68330ccb8fdc73b353bce45802881", "this_hash": "7e3e1a00b0979790b045edda3799c87507336f83fa8287c5180e02ba72064d1a", "signature": "mdpMJmGB2YH4ASRNb+ZKrQFDJxhvWMtP5OnhURXvjkGyNT6M3Qx+RK0iLTeicai8wvuo4/XxM9eFsQFUJ+ZTBQ==" }, { "seq": 4, "id": "ai-act-004-betygsattning", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.809Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "AI-betygsättning av uppsatser i grundskolan", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "e06d0e461ae2c48c13592611314430b9dbdc99eb454f124cb7fce71e74903e69", "output_hash": "98e372c8e9fa8e468f915f4e3435dd419aa828a7214ba714be5c94e505a1acdf", "agent_duration_ms": 36574, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 3, "rubric_score": 0.85, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.8499999999999999, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar high-risk korrekt", "weight": 0.35, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly classifies the system as \"Hög risk (high-risk)\" with primary basis Annex III §3(b) via Art 6.2, matching the expected tier and primary article exactly." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Annex III §3 specifikt (3a eller 3b accepteras)", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response cites \"Annex III §3(b)\" explicitly as primary article, matching the expected ground truth. Criterion accepts 3a or 3b; 3b is correctly cited." }, { "criterion": "Diskuterar att mänsklig sista-bedömning inte tar bort high-risk-status", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states \"Att läraren formellt har sista ordet utesluter inte high-risk-klassificeringen,\" correctly explaining the AI assessment steers the final grade. Criterion satisfied." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer", "weight": 0.15, "passed": false, "verdict": "FAIL", "reasoning": "Response cites Annex III §3(c) and Art 11, 12, which are not in the expected ground truth, constituting fabricated/unsupported citations for this scenario." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Annex III §3(b)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "7e3e1a00b0979790b045edda3799c87507336f83fa8287c5180e02ba72064d1a", "this_hash": "ac0e28dd51409f11c94bfd36cbdf7b0adbb64e2f8efae71c09ba18130f6fc0b4", "signature": "2qyrqRX2wQuvl7pRUG9XvzsPuAlMB1z3YH0yUIeXz409st24esS4JwyKpqXCay45dW8rLx9YgUpQHPhRPaiVCQ==" }, { "seq": 5, "id": "ai-act-005-spam-filter", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.809Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "AI-baserat spam-filter för företagspost", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "5631f93ac6860b1327a51319f26b3873d1460e13e22dd42db9718265762a7be8", "output_hash": "ce5e73feb6138d4e36ff118647e505c4bf514b2764d4c2e4a842c2daf6a66ba0", "agent_duration_ms": 41116, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar minimal-risk korrekt och INTE high-risk", "weight": 0.4, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly classifies the system as minimal-risk and rejects high-risk via Annex III negative match (Art 6(2)), correctly satisfying the binary criterion." }, { "criterion": "Förklarar att spam-filter inte ingår i Annex III", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states the system matches none of Annex III's eight categories (\"negativ träff\") and details why no category applies, directly satisfying the criterion." }, { "criterion": "Nämner Art 95 eller frivilliga uppförandekoder", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly cites Art 95 and frivilliga uppförandekoder multiple times, satisfying the binary criterion exactly as required by the ground truth." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (6(2), Annex III, 50.1/3/4, 95, 51, 4, GDPR 2016/679) are real AI Act provisions consistent with general legal knowledge. No fabricated article numbers, dates, or case-ids present." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 95 (frivilliga uppförandekoder)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "ac0e28dd51409f11c94bfd36cbdf7b0adbb64e2f8efae71c09ba18130f6fc0b4", "this_hash": "3da4bc7bfe45b17d96f20d8784a10c106000bbf24493af75e583caa15d13fb7a", "signature": "bGhE1IBV+gdJS+EHgWo+yadMfp4z6PVq+u8V0SCRYX7w6uE4I1Zb4Hkfv8Vqkm76Ofa2ixPFZ4ooRu8WMdM0Ag==" }, { "seq": 6, "id": "ai-act-006-anstalld-overvakning", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.809Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "AI för övervakning av anställdas produktivitet", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "9af60358cb2b53c3e26f5e51a26a980ef7cd1cafd5a395ec2d7016669719e9ad", "output_hash": "372c8004eae8d6d3a636a5f810760fd1dbaf75587adc22b1dda7ca9ae9b37701", "agent_duration_ms": 28469, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.9999999999999999, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar high-risk korrekt", "weight": 0.35, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly classifies the system as HIGH-RISK and correctly cites Annex III §4(b) via Art 6(2), matching the expected tier and primary article exactly." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Annex III §4(b) specifikt med rätt nummer och bokstav", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response cites \"Annex III §4(b)\" explicitly with the correct number (4) and letter (b), matching the expected primary article exactly. Multiple occurrences confirm precise citation." }, { "criterion": "Nämner GDPR eller arbetsrättsliga implikationer (MBL, arbetstidslag)", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The criterion only requires mentioning GDPR or labor-law implications. However, the response omits both GDPR and MBL/arbetsrätt entirely, never referencing data protection or employment law." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (6(2), 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) and Annex III §4(b) are genuine AI Act provisions accurately described. No fabricated article numbers, dates, or case-ids. Art 11/12 are valid additions, not hallucinations." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Annex III §4(b)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "3da4bc7bfe45b17d96f20d8784a10c106000bbf24493af75e583caa15d13fb7a", "this_hash": "e3a6efdce659ea488bb5b5729ed9b544158ff7d0fa3d03162376c5e909d06379", "signature": "YWt74e+ApbglsxLxClRu//pSPLBvYLBi1pkCYbRUSXbBfHZk1CqjsBEYvvE+cZwdeX4S8zU/gGw7G0KJ/v2eAA==" }, { "seq": 7, "id": "ai-act-007-generativ-marketing", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.810Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "Generativ AI för marknadsföringstexter", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "3e6280d2601375cfaa23e053990e32d20a98e6dcad2e00a616d7432a9ad1424c", "output_hash": "bc11b63314746d21f4752b3a78b22e36a911d4d14d67e6575422961fc74d9e82", "agent_duration_ms": 98736, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 3, "rubric_score": 0.75, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.75, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Korrekt skiljer leverantör (GPAI Art 51) från deployer", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states the e-commerce company is deployer (Art 3(4)), not provider, and correctly assigns GPAI obligations under Art 51-55 to the API-leverantören. This satisfies the provider/deployer distinction criterion." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Art 50.2 om märkning av AI-genererat innehåll", "weight": 0.25, "passed": false, "verdict": "FAIL", "reasoning": "Response classifies as minimal-risk under Art 95 and explicitly denies any Art 50 obligation, never citing Art 50.2 on labeling AI-generated content. It miscites Art 50.4 and claims no transparency duty applies." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte att 1M ord per månad utlöser GPAI-status (FLOPs-tröskel är 10^25)", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response never claims word volume triggers GPAI status. It correctly places GPAI obligations (Art 51-55) on the API provider, not the deployer, satisfying the no-hallucination criterion on the FLOPs threshold." }, { "criterion": "Identifierar inte felaktigt detta som high-risk", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Criterion is narrowly whether the response avoids a high-risk misclassification. The response classifies it as minimal-risk and explicitly rules out Annex III and Art 6(2), so it does not incorrectly label it high-risk." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 50.2 (märkning av AI-genererat innehåll)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "e3a6efdce659ea488bb5b5729ed9b544158ff7d0fa3d03162376c5e909d06379", "this_hash": "5d6e5075838024c8590d6639091f2a67e2377a5d8f61869427271e03fcae958a", "signature": "DGQhV51HwixG+vHbIBsWoRzEF078v45QNa+aMPpFmnuqAevygr+wvyT/H+k4Aw1jmAX/fVT4MipGLaTqp+HdDQ==" }, { "seq": 8, "id": "ai-act-008-trafikljus", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.810Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-eu-ai-act", "scenario_name": "AI-styrning av trafikljus i kommun", "category": "eu-ai-act", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "fb4c24adbe39c5b604541e6286d71797567c12288313275b3b9ee34fc43c05f7", "output_hash": "baa43ba31de35188484e7926e8161766245c9016f066b3cec8883ead4b725830", "agent_duration_ms": 28919, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.9999999999999999, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar high-risk korrekt", "weight": 0.35, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response correctly classifies the system as high-risk, citing the exact primary basis Annex III §2(a) via Art 6(2), matching the ground truth classification." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Annex III §2(a) specifikt", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly cites \"Annex III §2(a)\" multiple times as the primary legal basis, matching the expected ground-truth citation exactly." }, { "criterion": "Nämner Art 14 mänsklig övervakning eller Art 15 robusthet", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly cites both Art 14 (mänsklig övervakning) and Art 15 (noggrannhet, robusthet och cybersäkerhet), satisfying the criterion which requires either one." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (6(2), 9-15) are real EU AI Act provisions correctly applied. Art 26 and Annex III §2(a) match ground truth. No fabricated article numbers, dates, or case-ids present." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Annex III §2(a)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "5d6e5075838024c8590d6639091f2a67e2377a5d8f61869427271e03fcae958a", "this_hash": "6e8dfa7f69d2317dd82cbe14e65c252b536b6703a733341094669af3ad25d4ff", "signature": "uVvOaOoYJMchpcQpFKnNb+RSrtNst1/TqMoWZXgO3trNZq9WXDJgVG5mGyx4tMYhshIrxF9kzDOQtLux+OqHCQ==" }, { "seq": 9, "id": "gdpr-001-ehandel", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.810Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-gdpr-art30", "scenario_name": "Art 30-register för mindre e-handel", "category": "gdpr-art30", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "ba6f5465bdc2bfa4f320293352d19c1cce3d1e4b1aec9981f3b612c50faa5764", "output_hash": "4fe6b43d52e07fbde5f06446f650b74560796a1b2aff75560dd6487ba3a72cb5", "agent_duration_ms": 133356, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Levererar alla 7 fält enligt Art 30.1 (a-g)", "weight": 0.4, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly delivers all 7 Art 30.1 fields (a-g): kontaktuppgifter (a), ändamål (b), kategorier (c), mottagare (d), tredjelandsöverföring (e), lagringstider (f), säkerhetsåtgärder (g), labeled correctly across each processing activity." }, { "criterion": "Identifierar tredjelandsöverföring till USA via Meta/Stripe och citerar Art 30.1.e", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response flags third-country transfer to USA via Meta (and Stripe) and explicitly cites Art 30.1.e with documented safeguards (SCC/DPF), satisfying the criterion exactly." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Art 30.1 specifikt med punkt-bokstav (inte bara 'Art 30')", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response cites every required subpoint with letter (Art 30.1.a–g) as section headers, plus Art 30.1, 30.3, 30.4, 30.5 — exact point-letter format demanded by the criterion." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte fältkrav som inte finns i Art 30 (t.ex. uppfinner krav på DPIA-id i registret)", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response confines all Art 30.1 register fields to a-g without inventing a register field like \"DPIA-id.\" DPIA appears only as an external Art 35 recommendation/gap item, not as a fabricated Art 30 register requirement." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 30.1", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-30-gdpr/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "6e8dfa7f69d2317dd82cbe14e65c252b536b6703a733341094669af3ad25d4ff", "this_hash": "5254795fc8f751c925713e0c46d18b40ca98793e0ca21817df81346dd3242ca6", "signature": "jzuBzqwASCvyvxivjpfjX5JXyLgtXJYKZF5MLNB0ZXZG1YOtTNRPN+el2goKJQb7yLb68WY2jJqMcmS3iBFoBQ==" }, { "seq": 10, "id": "gdpr-002-hr-sjukfranvaro", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.810Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-gdpr-art30", "scenario_name": "Art 30-register för HR-system med sjukfrånvaro", "category": "gdpr-art30", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "30364a50b2f446978d12bf56289c8fb2d0e97160ae1b0e863066f9e00be2ca2f", "output_hash": "8b0ce658d476ceabef8c024d9aa7c374b992ce563602d4fe450670c37cde0a63", "agent_duration_ms": 110892, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar sjukfrånvaro/läkarintyg som Art 9.1 specialkategori", "weight": 0.35, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly flags läkarintyg/hälsouppgifter as \"specialkategori enligt Art 9.1\" in the högrisk-flagga, category (c), and throughout, correctly matching the expected Art 9.1 classification." }, { "criterion": "Förklarar att Art 30.5 SME-undantaget inte gäller pga Art 9-data", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states Art 30.5-undantaget is inapplicable because the processing involves Art 9 special-category health data (läkarintyg), citing the third indent of Art 30.5. Matches the expected criterion exactly." }, { "criterion": "Levererar alla 7 fält enligt Art 30.1 (a-g)", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response delivers all seven Art 30.1 fields (a) controller, (b) purposes, (c) data subjects/categories, (d) recipients, (e) third-country transfers, (f) retention periods, (g) security measures, each correctly labeled and substantively populated." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga artikelnummer (t.ex. uppfinner 'Art 9.4' eller felaktig 9.2-undantagslista)", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited articles (Art 30.1, 30.5, 9.1, 9.2(b), 6.1(c), 35, 35.3(b), 28.3, 32, 33, 34, 37.1(b), 5.1(e), 45, 46.2.c, 47-49) are genuine GDPR provisions used correctly. No fabricated article numbers." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 30.1", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-30-gdpr/", "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-9-gdpr/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "5254795fc8f751c925713e0c46d18b40ca98793e0ca21817df81346dd3242ca6", "this_hash": "f8eeaa5c22f56d18b41251b196129274663ec3e70e89dbdab89ad3e13fb2b830", "signature": "ulN/G7FT1jhyYwHa0F5H1das8UYCw8styew5U0YDIPerzrv7/8lNOUSheIAnZXUGVNHT6fOKOv9C/yYnj9RlAQ==" }, { "seq": 11, "id": "gdpr-003-b2b-webbformular", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-gdpr-art30", "scenario_name": "Art 30-register för B2B-marknadsföringslista", "category": "gdpr-art30", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "f17304d6151dd8908703086af54c211de0051e5336ea96cc45c18a28fcbab4a5", "output_hash": "840ec59eb15f36ed9fd798627a10ff6e0325fdd5e6ffc9c1a276cb593af7b14f", "agent_duration_ms": 95995, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Levererar Art 30-register med alla 7 fält", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response delivers all 7 Art 30.1 fields (a–g): controller, purposes, categories, recipients, third-country transfers, retention, security measures, each labeled with correct article references and populated content. Criterion fully satisfied." }, { "criterion": "Diskuterar rättslig grund (Art 6.1.a eller 6.1.f) korrekt", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response dedicates a full section to legal basis, correctly invoking Art 6.1.a (samtycke) for drip campaigns and Art 6.1.f (berättigat intresse) for sales contact, with accurate three-part balancing test and ePrivacy context. Meets the criterion." }, { "criterion": "Identifierar HubSpot tredjelandsöverföring och Art 30.1.e", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly identifies HubSpot as US-based, flags third-country transfer under Art 30.1.e, and documents SCC plus EU-US Data Privacy Framework, matching the expected ground truth exactly." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte ePrivacy- eller PuL-paragrafer som inte finns", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response references ePrivacy as implemented in marknadsföringslagen and lagen om elektronisk kommunikation without citing any fabricated paragraph number. No invented PuL or ePrivacy article references appear; all specific citations are real GDPR provisions." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 30.1", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-30-gdpr/", "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-6-gdpr/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "f8eeaa5c22f56d18b41251b196129274663ec3e70e89dbdab89ad3e13fb2b830", "this_hash": "1a915b34430b98c3ae9a57a075a3779f21d70f0e57ea329b173183c861e02385", "signature": "DG0MpEAKNmPFaGUjOAhBmzZg3192YUaqCcX3rtfrwN2KpWcWsqrTQs3ptbGrWTDpE/4e3gGihpLdGMVesMaLDg==" }, { "seq": 12, "id": "gdpr-004-granska-register", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-gdpr-art30", "scenario_name": "Granska befintligt Art 30-register med luckor", "category": "gdpr-art30", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "272977ba5f39c35c7f04911a822bcd4408b252e44574aa51c4b8291d5185bd91", "output_hash": "04023fe1faf80aacb31037b7c9dc9440b0d2592c17eb567add651a375d4bfc6d", "agent_duration_ms": 68439, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar minst 4 av 5 saknade obligatoriska fält (a, d, e, f, g)", "weight": 0.4, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response identifies all five required missing/insufficient fields: (a) kontaktuppgifter/DPO, (d) mottagare saknas helt, (e) tredjelandsöverföring odeklarerad, (f) \"tills vidare\" icke-compliant, (g) \"lösenordsskyddat\" otillräckligt. Exceeds 4-of-5 threshold; citations accurate." }, { "criterion": "Specifikt flaggar 'Tills vidare' som otillräcklig lagringstid", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly flags \"Tills vidare\" under field (f), stating it \"är inte en lagringstid. Det är dess motsats\" and labels it icke-compliant, citing Art 30.1.f's requirement for förutsedda raderingstidsfrister." }, { "criterion": "Specifikt flaggar 'Lösenordsskyddat' som otillräcklig säkerhetsbeskrivning", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Fält (g)-sektionen flaggar uttryckligen \"Lösenordsskyddat\" som otillräcklig: \"uppfyller inte kravet på en allmän beskrivning per Art 30.1.g\", \"en enskild teknisk kontroll, inte en beskrivning\", och listar konkreta åtgärder. Kriteriet uppfyllt." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte krav som inte finns i Art 30.1 (t.ex. uppfinner krav på DPIA-länk eller behandlingsregister-id)", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response stays within Art 30.1 fields (a-g) and correctly references related articles (Art 26, 28, 32, 44-49, 30.5). No fabricated requirements like DPIA-links or register-ids invented." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 30.1", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-30-gdpr/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "1a915b34430b98c3ae9a57a075a3779f21d70f0e57ea329b173183c861e02385", "this_hash": "b3d0da84d13bb962f827e4ef9c9a6fbb0bcd6498e75b9908e0e38c6d040b68b6", "signature": "m0Cr7wtJcOcYkio8F/RB66uwSsoLf1xfwE0wrj6Wj82E7rlRyBsSys+XwAlVObGxxCYgOWN+v2TsvpdM5Oo8BA==" }, { "seq": 13, "id": "gdpr-005-art30-trskel", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-gdpr-art30", "scenario_name": "Krävs Art 30-register? SME-tröskel-bedömning", "category": "gdpr-art30", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "42b92b9dd8572ca84b42dae2d51f98afb4cea2129a97985de83a83a17a5a100f", "output_hash": "e1b2a0a5a6c16180b40d39c0f3c8278a1b2c9221eb919ff6ef88090f0dedc3cb", "agent_duration_ms": 37002, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 2, "rubric_score": 0.4, "rubric_weighted_raw": 0.4, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Korrekt slutsats att Art 30.5 undantaget sannolikt gäller", "weight": 0.35, "passed": false, "verdict": "FAIL", "reasoning": "The criterion requires concluding the Art 30.5 exemption likely applies. The model concluded the opposite, that the exemption does NOT apply (rekvisit 3 fails) and a register is required, directly contradicting the expected ground truth." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Art 30.5 specifikt", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly and repeatedly cites \"Art 30.5\" by name, matching the expected primary article. The criterion only requires specific citation of Art 30.5, which is satisfied." }, { "criterion": "Listar alla tre rekvisit (250 anställda, tillfällig, riskbedömning, Art 9)", "weight": 0.25, "passed": false, "verdict": "FAIL", "reasoning": "Response omits the Art 9 special-categories requirement from its three-requisite list (Rekvisit 1-3 cover only headcount, risk, occasional). Criterion requires all rekvisit including Art 9. Treating Art 9 as mere afterthought, not a listed requisite, fails coverage." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte exempelvis en undantagströskel som inte finns", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response uses only real GDPR thresholds: the genuine 250-employee figure and the three actual Art 30.5 conditions (under 250, no risk, occasional). Articles 30.5, 30.1, 9, 10, 44-49 are all real. No fabricated threshold invented." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 30.5", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://gdpr-info.eu/art-30-gdpr/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "b3d0da84d13bb962f827e4ef9c9a6fbb0bcd6498e75b9908e0e38c6d040b68b6", "this_hash": "2c041ad395c5aa3138156c1aa1ac477ef0d36f2bc6f5cc7b15e8aedd60dd2f5f", "signature": "HxrFPQRZv8p5k0Wd82HFMUTK07pE0s9TufWJaVMX4SSLKWdYhU90vjovt0FIU2yRGp9lPa83lkuH1CJsIq6cCA==" }, { "seq": 14, "id": "imy-001-klarna-2022", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-imy-beslut", "scenario_name": "IMY-beslut mot Klarna 2022 - artikel-analys", "category": "imy-beslut", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "0a695bc5b2ab67bb656012ac3c35a6a2efc271b0220fe802c8ebd4a43c3fcec7", "output_hash": "1577c50608762e0f816e41c1cda3ddf4dc536e7c40bf1d220ff6ce6c97522f63", "agent_duration_ms": 56437, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Citerar Art 13 eller Art 14 (eller båda) som primär grund", "weight": 0.4, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly cites both Art 13 and Art 14 as the åberopade (primary) articles, with detailed sub-paragraph analysis (13.1.c, 13.2.b/c), matching the expected primary basis exactly." }, { "criterion": "Identifierar att bristen rör transparens/informationsplikt", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Svaret identifierar tydligt och upprepat att bristen rör transparens/informationsplikt (Art 13/14), explicit \"Sanktionen avsåg uteslutande bristen på transparent information.\" Kriteriet uppfyllt." }, { "criterion": "Anger korrekt belopp (7,5 MSEK) eller intervall (flera miljoner)", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response correctly states the final sanction was 7,5 miljoner SEK, matching the expected ground-truth amount." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte att andra artiklar åberopades (t.ex. Art 32 säkerhet, eller Art 9 specialkategori)", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response cites only Art 12, 13, 14, 20, 21 as invoked, plus Art 6 grounds. Art 9, 25, 39, 83 appear only in advisory remediation/risk context, not claimed as åberopade. No fabricated security-article claim." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 13", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://www.imy.se/link/89616ea89e4e4af1ac7e562a7670048d.aspx" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "2c041ad395c5aa3138156c1aa1ac477ef0d36f2bc6f5cc7b15e8aedd60dd2f5f", "this_hash": "e76d689b3ec5e9783010df940a541b85db20dbf6a24ec11ad103842c0fa1c190", "signature": "nhVtYIWp5KjCuWq5Cua1SCm9soNX3iD6LpJMXHLCy+HIu7ZwywpB+PIfPCixhWQJx5P2mxH2tawILN8BZsU/Aw==" }, { "seq": 15, "id": "imy-002-skelleftea-2019", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-imy-beslut", "scenario_name": "Skellefteå gymnasienämnd 2019 - ansiktsigenkänning i skola", "category": "imy-beslut", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "d67a76db956c26c130837a9912dd4b0323771e2d13a2d1d17fa6416ed48e02ee", "output_hash": "6fb23db075b1e3cb76dc39adfc425df0536fc6169b4c4ddf09d2d8c43c07ee78", "agent_duration_ms": 64051, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar Art 9 (specialkategori biometri) som central grund", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response cites Art 9.1 and 9.2 explicitly, has a dedicated section \"Varför var Art 9 central?\", correctly identifies biometric data as specialkategori requiring explicit Art 9.2 grund. Criterion fully met." }, { "criterion": "Identifierar Art 35 DPIA-brist eller Art 5 dataminimering", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly identifies both Art 35 DPIA deficiency (\"ingen adekvat DPIA genomförts\") and Art 5.1.c dataminimering with mindre ingripande metoder. Either alone satisfies the criterion; both are present and correctly reasoned." }, { "criterion": "Förklarar varför samtycke var ogiltigt (beroendeförhållande/maktobalans)", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly explains the consent was invalid due to structural power imbalance between students and school authority (beroendeförhållande/maktasymmetri), citing EDPB guidance, matching the ground-truth dependency rationale." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte fel myndighetsnamn (var Datainspektionen, INTE IMY 2019)", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response correctly names Datainspektionen as the issuing authority for the 2019 decision. It only mentions IMY in forward-looking remediation/rebreach context, not as the 2019 sanctioning body. No authority-name hallucination." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 5", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://edpb.europa.eu/news/national-news/2019/facial-recognition-school-renders-swedens-first-gdpr-fine_en" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "e76d689b3ec5e9783010df940a541b85db20dbf6a24ec11ad103842c0fa1c190", "this_hash": "23e62fdae35d0593a9736df68da18a569d38cbf7216c2305b7d200b24cc4af38", "signature": "/n9aNnnytawktg3w1uptzzwa6Jz3+rUcI7VOwH5oDrtvXHScggV/81Tq752UUz+IWZWvvtIukcsmOlJ8y/P6DQ==" }, { "seq": 16, "id": "imy-003-medhelp-datalackage", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-imy-beslut", "scenario_name": "MedHelp 2021 1177-dataläckage - remediation", "category": "imy-beslut", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "9aa7da2e788fed82815bd58b6f0c616ad7edd93baaff6e99a4a156f5bb6900d2", "output_hash": "3a2c83cb6e3aaad00e6bc7ccb63ee9107aa120fcd49db3c7cc4f0fa891ec1ace", "agent_duration_ms": 62900, "rubric_criteria_total": 5, "rubric_criteria_passed": 5, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Inkluderar Art 33 anmälan inom 72 timmar", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly cites Art 33 for breach notification to IMY within 72 hours, both in the article list and as checklist item 2, noting the 72-hour deadline. Criterion fully met." }, { "criterion": "Inkluderar Art 34 information till registrerade", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly cites Art 34 in the article list and dedicates checklist item 5 to assessing the duty to inform affected patients without undue delay at high risk, matching the expected obligation." }, { "criterion": "Citerar Art 32 säkerhet vid tekniska åtgärder", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly cites Art 32 for technical measures, including encryption at rest, authentication, access control, and network segmentation (items 1, 7, 9, 10), matching the expected ground truth." }, { "criterion": "Identifierar Art 9 hälsodata som specialkategori (kräver stärkta åtgärder)", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states patient-callbacks är hälsodata, klassificerar behandlingen som specialkategorier enligt Art 9, och att detta \"skärper säkerhetskraven väsentligt jämfört med ordinära personuppgifter.\" Criterion fully met." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inte tidsfrister som inte finns i GDPR (t.ex. säger 24h istället för 72h)", "weight": 0.1, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response consistently states the correct 72-hour deadline (Art 33) multiple times and never substitutes a fabricated shorter limit. The \"24-48 timmar\" and \"4 veckor\" labels are remediation phasing, not GDPR statutory deadlines." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Art 33 (anmälan inom 72h)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://www.imy.se/link/452e82d18b204ac5875ccc9950aa6e7c.aspx" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "23e62fdae35d0593a9736df68da18a569d38cbf7216c2305b7d200b24cc4af38", "this_hash": "6c7f4ebe88459d3046c9a9f739e3dbe9912f7ee673dba735dd8019ffa907be43", "signature": "sKjGzXFUAKu4wmmEMBukEKgHRY+LQaegbb7chE8rdp9YLGmjqT+Y5ToY/JYU45zqhz1ZgHGLrWbe21iFb34HAw==" }, { "seq": 17, "id": "sfs-001-bokforing-retention", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-sfs", "scenario_name": "Bokföringslag 7 års arkivering vs kundregister", "category": "sfs", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "6b635e610eefd6600df8b3a556fe366169dbbadf6902ef0d4d6be3073838f667", "output_hash": "5a59ee2ad075926cb1277d3afba320e0d12c5fdace547c60933ab5b57960b70c", "agent_duration_ms": 86894, "rubric_criteria_total": 4, "rubric_criteria_passed": 4, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Identifierar att systemet bryter mot 7 kap 2 § Bokföringslagen", "weight": 0.3, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly states the \"permanent radering\"-funktion bryter mot Bokföringslag (1999:1078) 7 kap 2 §, citing the exact paragraph and explaining the 7-year retention violation for fakturor. Criterion fully met." }, { "criterion": "Citerar exakt paragraf '7 kap 2 §' eller motsvarande (inte bara 'bokföringslagen')", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly cites \"Bokföringslag (1999:1078) 7 kap 2 §\" multiple times as the primary paragraph, exactly matching the expected ground-truth citation. Not generic." }, { "criterion": "Förklarar kollisionen GDPR Art 17 vs Art 6.1.c rättslig förpliktelse", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly explains the collision: Art 17.1 grants erasure, Art 17.3(b) exempts legal obligations, and Art 6.1.c becomes the legal basis for retaining accounting data under BFL 7:2. Hierarchy correctly stated, matching ground truth." }, { "criterion": "Föreslår praktisk lösning: skilj räkenskapsdata från övrig kunddata", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly separates räkenskapsdata (fakturor, avtal, betalningshistorik, 7-årsbevarande) from övrig kunddata (support-tickets, marknadsföringsdata) that can be deleted, and proposes a three-step selective deletion system. Criterion fully met." } ], "expected_primary_article": "Bokföringslag (1999:1078) 7 kap 2 §", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/bokforingslag-19991078_sfs-1999-1078/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "6c7f4ebe88459d3046c9a9f739e3dbe9912f7ee673dba735dd8019ffa907be43", "this_hash": "46b75bbd46f08ea398cbf0118ac8283003728558f238c93d4ebfccc2ed5f3d48", "signature": "2/IgsHneOqmC4FXO3d/Z+GxkHPvWRb0yk0TcTNan2aMCweAXAXdSLmMXjHalJfLHoiuvHdrviFdbuUNHqq+fDA==" }, { "seq": 18, "id": "sfs-002-tradingakademi-finansinspektion", "ts": "2026-05-20T19:01:04.811Z", "org_id": "kapaciti-evals", "modul_id": "regulatory-sfs", "scenario_name": "Trading-akademi vs investeringsrådgivning SFS 2007:528", "category": "sfs", "agent_model": "claude-sonnet-4-6", "judge_model": "claude-opus-4-7", "input_hash": "8f6afe988dcd9cdacbf912c6fcd17b9edb1d43ba6d986987fc694da52e83de35", "output_hash": "18d3c4cd34ce46e4decc0acde34b073a6077a94c2c35df6a4d4ba4eb78f6463a", "agent_duration_ms": 99194, "rubric_criteria_total": 5, "rubric_criteria_passed": 5, "rubric_score": 1, "rubric_weighted_raw": 1, "rubric_details": [ { "criterion": "Citerar 1 kap 4 c § specifikt för definition av investeringsrådgivning", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response explicitly cites \"SFS 2007:528, 1 kap 4 c §\" as the definition of investeringsrådgivning, matching the expected ground-truth citation exactly, with correct definitional language." }, { "criterion": "Citerar 2 kap 1 § för tillståndsplikt", "weight": 0.2, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "The response explicitly cites \"SFS 2007:528, 2 kap 1 §\" as the source of tillståndsplikt, matching the expected ground-truth citation exactly." }, { "criterion": "Ger ett nyanserat 'kan kräva' svar med rekvisit-analys (inte ja/nej)", "weight": 0.25, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Response delivers a nuanced \"kan kräva\" conclusion via full three-rekvisit analysis, treating 1-on-1 coaching and hypothetical scenarios as the gränsfall risk rather than a flat yes/no. Matches criterion exactly." }, { "criterion": "Rekommenderar konkret next-step (jurist eller Finansinspektionen)", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "Final section explicitly recommends consulting a finance-law jurist and contacting/requesting clarification from Finansinspektionen, plus separate point 4 on FI's tillståndsenhet. Concrete next-step satisfied." }, { "criterion": "Hallucinerar inga paragrafer som inte finns i SFS 2007:528", "weight": 0.15, "passed": true, "verdict": "PASS", "reasoning": "All cited paragraphs (1 kap 4 c §, 2 kap 1 §, 1 kap 4 § p6, 2 kap 5 §, 25 kap) exist in SFS 2007:528. MiFID II/MiCA references are accurate general law. No fabricated paragraph numbers." } ], "expected_primary_article": "SFS 2007:528, 1 kap 4 c § (definition investeringsrådgivning) och 2 kap 1 § (tillståndsplikt)", "sources_count": 1, "references": [ "https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2007528-om-vardepappersmarknaden_sfs-2007-528/" ], "decision_status": "evaluated", "prev_hash": "46b75bbd46f08ea398cbf0118ac8283003728558f238c93d4ebfccc2ed5f3d48", "this_hash": "5797e90e1ecde872c8ecd65c7b79e6e694763e65545f5840aeac8cd02a652d81", "signature": "eXvZ3WczQrsotfUz2StQ/X1Oe57Tm+4mmP6P2Dg7GtcWZk22hFLyl899wIB/cPOOe0HsWXhux/YnqE0bzvy+AA==" } ], "public_key": "282d6f5b84906548e29bcec5bee7d37b3f023f2b6c967c68fbeb944c84356998", "public_key_fingerprint": "sha256:0e6daf50937454fcfaa1e9f74713b430bb04c60fb56bc30857ef632fad614505" }